 |
 |
Just to amplify @bbockelm point (that this is unlikely to be a problem in HTTP-TPC), by mentioning that adding a control mechanism (through FTS) would mean selectively disabling IPv6 on a transfer-by-transfer basis. I suppose this could be needed, but I'm struggling to see when it would be needed (or appropriate, even). Therefore, I suggest we should wait to see some concrete use-cases for this functionality, before updating the protocol. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1472#issuecomment-1266570629 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1