 |
 |
> What do you mean "manual tests are fine"? How do they differ from the ones that fail? ### Manual tests By manual tests, I mean myself running ```bash gfal-copy -p -v -f -K adler32 --checksum-mode both --copy-mode pull davs://eoscms.cern.ch:443/eos/cms/store/data/Run2018B/ScoutingMonitor/RAW/v1/000/317/475/00000/F0A5417E-ED68-E811-B824-FA163ED2A73C.root davs://xrootd.phy.bris.ac.uk:1094/xrootd/cms/store/user/kreczko/FDCF2C44-F6CA-FB47-8E01-1D145FD01B31.root.DESTINATION+CHECKSUM++Neon ``` I can make these fail by setting `tlsreuse on`, etc, as described in https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1736#issuecomment-1277543633 and they would fail consistently before the most recent updates. Most recently I've tried different xrootd versions which also updated [some dependencies](https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1736#issuecomment-1292240061) - now this works too ### Automated transfers I compare these to **automated FTS transfers** that, to the best of my knowledge, execute the same command. The automated tests fail right now 95% of the time due to the session cache issue (transfer OK, but checksum request right after fails). I do not see any correlation as to site, protocol, FTS server used, etc for the successes or the failures. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1736#issuecomment-1310269873 You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1