@amadio commented on this pull request.
> @@ -388,6 +413,23 @@ namespace XrdCl
message.AdvanceCursor( bytesRead );
}
+ // Unmarchal to message body
+ Log *log = DefaultEnv::GetLog();
+ XRootDStatus st = XRootDTransport::UnMarchalStatusMore( message );
+ if( !st.IsOK() && st.code == errDataError )
+ {
+ log->Error( XRootDTransportMsg, "[msg: 0x%x] %s", &message,
+ st.GetErrorMessage().c_str() );
+ return st;
+ }
+
+ if( !st.IsOK() )
Why do you need to test twice for `!st.IsOK()`? Could these two ifs not be joined into a single one?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1854#pullrequestreview-1295811979
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <[log in to unmask]>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
