@amadio commented on this pull request.
In src/XrdCl/XrdClXRootDTransport.cc:
> @@ -388,6 +413,23 @@ namespace XrdCl message.AdvanceCursor( bytesRead ); } + // Unmarchal to message body + Log *log = DefaultEnv::GetLog(); + XRootDStatus st = XRootDTransport::UnMarchalStatusMore( message ); + if( !st.IsOK() && st.code == errDataError ) + { + log->Error( XRootDTransportMsg, "[msg: 0x%x] %s", &message, + st.GetErrorMessage().c_str() ); + return st; + } + + if( !st.IsOK() )
Sure, but you can have an if ( !st.IsOK() )
, and inside it have another if (or switch) to treat differently the different kinds of errors. But I guess this is not so performance critical, so it's not the end of the world if we check twice.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1