 |
 |
While converting the `XrdCl::URL` tests to GoogleTest, I noticed that it accepts zero, negative, and big (>65536) port numbers as valid. For example, `"root://eospilot.cern.ch:-1"`, and `"root://eospilot.cern.ch:281474976710656"` are both considered valid. I also noticed that a URL with parameters, but without a path will be considered invalid, i.e. something like `http://localhost:8080?param=value`. However, that should likely be considered valid, with path normalized to `"/"`, as that's what the browser does. URLs with empty username and/or password are also rejected, i.e., something like `http://:@localhost` and `http:[log in to unmask] Should these be considered valid? The browser seems to accept them. The final thing is that `XrdCl::URL` cannot accept passwords that contain the character `@` or `/` in them, but I guess that's not really a bug, even if those are supposedly valid characters for passwords. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1960 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1