Print

Print


@amadio So, I had two comments on corrections needed (i.e. sysheaders before local headers and non-directory qualified includes). I suggested correcting the sysheader problem but ignoring the include problem as it was endemic to this whole package. Then I realized that so was the sysheader problem. So, perhaps asking @ccaffy to correct the sysheader problem in files he touched is not a good idea and instead we should do a global change using another pr. What do you think?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1950#issuecomment-1478836469
You are receiving this because you commented.

Message ID: <[log in to unmask]>

########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1