 |
 |
I tried client/server combinations from 5.5.3 and our build of the master branch from last week. The results are the same. I tried with **defaults, xrootd.async off, xrootd.async off nosf** ... results are almost always the same. There must be some bottlenecks server side with multiplexed/parallel connections, because with individual connections it is so much faster ... ok, when my target can write 'only' 1 GB/s I actually don't see a difference between the three ways to copy, but with NVMes as target it makes already a difference. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/1938#issuecomment-1451546918 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1