 |
 |
I think you figured out the reason why I implemented no-cache and no-store as the same … no-store behavior should be sufficient to meet the no-cache requirements. The use I'm thinking of is mostly along the lines of monitoring and debugging. Hence, I don’t mind the fact it’s not highly optimized. Is there anything wrong with still using the same code paths? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1953#issuecomment-1467131885 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1