Hi,
I found my old talk with the proof-of-principle energy estimator. It was in Dec. 2021 (!!):
https://indico.fnal.gov/event/52371/
On the slides (p. 11) it looks like I claim 3% muon energy resolution around Emu=1 GeV, though the plot there suggests 4% is maybe a fairer number to quote. It's also worth recognizing that this number is a fairly strong function of the true neutrino energy
because of track reconstruction/PID inefficiency (at the low end) and containment issues (at the high end). (The slides also reminded me that at the time I didn't make any effort to use the actual PID GNN, but rather just used track length as a muon PID,
which worked ~ok. Using the actual PID algorithm should recover many of the ones I lost at low Emu due to my very crude muon selection.)
-Jeremy
Hi everyone,
We'll hold our ML meeting tomorrow, Wed. Apr. 5th at 2 PM CT on the usual zoom:
https://stanford.zoom.us/my/drielsma?pwd=WU16RGJtWGtKZ0I2N04xSlN6Y2lXdz09 (ID: 973 985 8922, PW: 105658)
If you have any slides you'd like to share, please make sure to upload them to this page:
https://indico.slac.stanford.edu/event/7988/
All the best,
Francois and Kazu
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL&A=1
Caution: This message originated from outside of the Tufts University organization. Please exercise caution when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, email the TTS Service Desk at [log in to unmask] or call them directly at 617-627-3376.
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL&A=1
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=DUNEND-SIMRECO-TECHNICAL&A=1