In fact you're entirely right; syncWait is not an atomic variable with any kind of memory ordering guarantee. So there's nothing that requires another core to agree to see the nullptr. (Although I expect this would work anywhere we'd test it) Thanks a lot. In any case the PR is updated.

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1996#issuecomment-1505471727", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1996#issuecomment-1505471727", "name": "View Pull Request" }, "description": "View this Pull Request on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1