@amadio commented on this pull request.
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ int XrdCryptosslX509CreateProxy(const char *fnc, const char *fnk,
}
//
// Sign the request
- if (!(X509_REQ_sign(preq, ekPX, EVP_sha1()))) {
+ if (!(X509_REQ_sign(preq, ekPX, EVP_sha256()))) {
I think run time would be better, but I'd like to hear what @abh thinks about it too. If SHA-256 works everywhere and is relatively future-proof, we could just switch the default and still leave it hard-coded.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1999#discussion_r1168649534
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <[log in to unmask]>
########################################################################
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1
