 |
 |
> OK, all I see is using std removals. I also see that implicit use of std was already corrected in a previous pull request. So, it looks OK. I was wondering why did we eschew using declaration notation to fix this? This is the same pull request, but I separated the parts fixing implicit usage of std and pushed it, so all that's left here is the removal of `using namespace std;` from the code. As for using declarations, in one of our meetings when we discussed this, we decided to keep using `std::` in code rather than declarations for the sake of consistency. Since we cannot use declarations in our headers, rather than have a separate policy for headers and sources, we decided to go with using `std::` everywhere. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/1933#issuecomment-1511354058 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1