Yes, it's a fallthrough case which makes it much more obvious what is happening. Don't forget to specify [[falthrough]] On Fri, 26 May 2023, ccaffy wrote: > @ccaffy commented on this pull request. > > > >> @@ -1391,6 +1391,10 @@ static int mapError(int rc) > case ETIMEDOUT: return kXR_ReqTimedOut; > case EBADF: return kXR_FileNotOpen; > case ECANCELED: return kXR_Cancelled; > + // In the case one tries to delete a non-empty directory > + // we have decided that until the next major release > + // the kXR_ItExists flag will be returned > + case ENOTEMPTY: return kXR_ItExists; > > I do not understand :thinking: Is it a fallthrough case? I just return kXR_ItExists when the errno code is ENOTEMPTY. Each switch case has a return value, so there's no need for a `[[fallthrough]];` attribute, isn't it? > > -- > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/2016#discussion_r1206499288 > You are receiving this because your review was requested. > > Message ID: ***@***.***> -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/pull/2016#issuecomment-1565219296 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1