Oh, yes, the majority talk here is about API compatability which I know is
problematic. What we are talking about here is wire compatability. That is
also questionable given the large changes in 3.0. Ine could convince
oneself that this is the key issue since it works with fedora38 which is
in the same release series but fails for 1.0.2. Any chance you would try
the same test with 1.1.1?
On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
> EL7: 1.0.2k
> Alma9: 3.0.7
> Fedora38: 3.0.8
>
> --
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
> https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2014#issuecomment-1571520238
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>
> Message ID: ***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.
Message ID: <xrootd/xrootd/issues/2014/1571559775@github.com>
[
{
"@context": "http://schema.org",
"@type": "EmailMessage",
"potentialAction": {
"@type": "ViewAction",
"target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2014#issuecomment-1571559775",
"url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2014#issuecomment-1571559775",
"name": "View Issue"
},
"description": "View this Issue on GitHub",
"publisher": {
"@type": "Organization",
"name": "GitHub",
"url": "https://github.com"
}
}
]
Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list
To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1