Actually, the original design would handle this

I don't understand this comment. Let's ignore the headers for a second -- how are you planning on implementing the fireflies / packet marking. None of the shared layers see the HTTP socket so, while we could reuse quite a bit of logic, there's custom handling and sending of firefly packets needed, right?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

[ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { "@type": "ViewAction", "target": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2024#issuecomment-1580977712", "url": "https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2024#issuecomment-1580977712", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list

To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link:
https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1