 |
 |
Hi Max, That is correct. We increased the default allowable length to cover all the cases we could think of. You can, ofcourse, make it largeer using the -maxresp option: https://xrootd.slac.stanford.edu/doc/dev56/ofs_config.htm#_Toc136617302 In any case, the size is fixed at the set value. Allowing arbitrary lengths would be a considerable development effort. Andy On Tue, 1 Aug 2023, maksiks wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I am testing xrdfs query prepare call in xrootd version 5.6.1 and would like to ask the following question just to make sure what I see is correct: to me it looks like the length of the string the call can handle is increased but still there is a limit on the overall length; the call can't handle arbitrarily long string. It is right? > Thank you, --Max > > > -- > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: > https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2023#issuecomment-1660197824 > You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. > > Message ID: ***@***.***> -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xrootd/xrootd/issues/2023#issuecomment-1663316025 You are receiving this because you commented. Message ID: <[log in to unmask]> ######################################################################## Use REPLY-ALL to reply to list To unsubscribe from the XROOTD-DEV list, click the following link: https://listserv.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=XROOTD-DEV&A=1