VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alessio Sarti <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
25 Jan 2002 01:05:12 -0800 (PST)Fri, 25 Jan 2002 01:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>  this is the plan to complete the production for SemiExclusive Reco on
> run1+run2. At the moment we are able to run on bfobjy and kanga (both Sun and
> Linux). Then the rate is really improved compared to the last weeks. I
> remind you the situation:
>
>  Dstar: all 51.3 fb-1 finished!!! we are going to produce the ultimate
> reduced collections.
>

I know that we don't have time to waste, but before producing reduced
collections it is not better to have checked the timestamp for duplicated
events?
I know that this would mean waiting that all the productions are ended,
but what is the gain compared with doing the reduced collections work
twice?

Thanks,
Alessio

P.S. my english MAY not be perfect ;-)   ....beg me pardon!




ATOM RSS1 RSS2