VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kerstin Tackmann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
17 May 2004 09:29:40 +0200 (MET DST)Mon, 17 May 2004 09:29:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (34 lines)

Hi Urs,

we do not really understand the implications of your answer. Does it mean
that the inclusive production needs to be done again?

Ric, if the production needs to be redone, should we do it like last time,
you submit and I keep an eye on the jobs?

Kerstin


On Mon, 17 May 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote:

>
> Hoi Daniele,
>
> I just checked anaQA in cvs: there is no significant difference to the
> version in use  last spring ($rootbase and similar  are different ...)
> runQA always was a hack  and never optimized for argument checking. It
> hit me a few times last year. The block of commented
>
> # my $mcFlags = ...
>
> is  a reflection  of  that.   The warning  messages  should have  been
> activated.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2