VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Concezio Bozzi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
26 Jul 2006 17:02:32 +0200Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:02:32 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi Heiko, 
seems good to me. 
Concezio. 

Il giorno mer, 26-07-2006 alle 16:17 +0200, Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> So far, I have only received one (positive) feedback.
> Please tell me if this sounds ok for everybody so that
> I can communicate it to the AWG conveners.
> 
> Cheers,
> Heiko
> 
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > here is the tentative plan for publication:
> > 
> > End of July:  Documentation of new strategy of mES fit into BAD 
> >               (Antonio & Concezio)
> >               Also D** issue?
> > August:       Parallel work:
> >               * Working on backup solution (Wolfgang)
> >                 --> higher purity cut: Old model
> >               * New strategy with higher purity cut (Chukwudi)
> > CM (Sept.):   Presentation of mES fit strategy
> >               Supporting document with fixed mES strategy --> AWG
> > End of Sep:   Analysis to RC (fit strategy approved?)
> > Beg. of Oct:  If yes: Evaluation of systematics
> > Mid of  Oct:  Paper draft to RC and then to CWR
> > 
> > Please give additional inputs/comments about the time line and/or
> > missing stuff.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Heiko
> > 




ATOM RSS1 RSS2