VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kerstin Tackmann <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
19 Sep 2006 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT)Tue, 19 Sep 2006 08:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (61 lines)

Hi Heiko,

Francesca, Antonio, and I were there earlier, but there did not seem to be
much to discuss, since Antonio is still hunting the D**-bug (if it turns
out to be a bug...).

Cheers,
Kerstin


On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have called in with a delay of 20 Minutes, sorry about that.
> In any case, there is nobody online anymore.
>
> Cheers,
> Heiko
>
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
>
> > Sure,
> > since we want to compute the S/P ratios (and maybe fit the distribution
> > with polynomials or gaus functions) on MC with all reweightings, I have
> > to be sure that the D** reweighting is working as well.
> >
> > There are no differences so far in S/P ratios computed on dataset with
> > and without this kind of reweighting. So I'm looking to see what's wrong.
> >
> > When we use the D** reweighting, the p* factor goes below to 1.
> > I think we also need to solve this, don't we?
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > Heiko Lacker wrote:
> > > Could you please provide more details?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Heiko
> > >
> > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2006, Antonio Petrella wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Heiko,
> > >>
> > >> not by my side, I'm still stuck with this reweighting issue.
> > >>
> > >> Antonio
> > >>
> > >> Heiko Lacker ha scritto:
> > >>> Hi Antonio and Chukwudi,
> > >>>
> > >>> any news?
> > >>>
> > >>> Heiko
> >
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2