VUB-RECOIL Archives

Vub measurement using recoil of fully reconstructed Bs

VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heiko Lacker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
1 Jun 2004 10:43:24 +0200 (MET DST)Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:43:24 +0200 (MET DST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (53 lines)
Yes.

Heiko

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote:

> Just to clarify to everybody, we are talking of
> Chapter 8 of BAD894v3 (correct?)
> 	ciao
> 	ric
>
> On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will not make it for the meeting (SB pratice talks).
> >
> > It would be good to have feedback concerning the method
> > Kerstin and myself proposed to set CL's on mb and a using.
> > Please let us know by email if there are objections to
> > this.
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Riccardo Faccini wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > although it is a period of BAD readings, it would be nice to have a brief
> > > chat today with those who can attend. The topics I see as useful, if
> > > people can attend,  are:
> > >
> > >  - production status
> > >  - Q^2 mX status
> > >  - how will we converge on SF parameters: b-> s gamma, b-> clnu, b->ulnu (
> > > I was hoping to have a proposal  for today, but I am late and will only
> > > have a proposal on how to proceed)
> > >  - no-SF status
> > >
> > > If I am not wrong we do not have a resevation for today so we can use the
> > > italian number
> > > > > numero          +39/02 21897
> > > > > codice accesso  100052#
> > >
> > >
> > > talk to you later
> > > 	ciao
> > > 	ric
> > >
> >
>



ATOM RSS1 RSS2