LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  December 2001

VUB-RECOIL December 2001

Subject:

Re: sx-breco, mode-dependent (mode by mode study)

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

28 Dec 2001 06:25:06 -0800 (PST)Fri, 28 Dec 2001 06:25:06 -0800 (PST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (100 lines)


Hi all,

 I performed a comparison ibu vs cpf looking at mes plot mode by mode.

 I started with the tags used by Urs for the mc-data production (see
IslBrecoilUser/tags-112101). In ran just one reduced superblock1
collection for the D* (~2fb-1). The statisics is low but the results seem
to be compatible. The only relevant difference is in the B mode 38-39 (B
-> D 2k pi in K* window). There was a bug in the code for this mode. Now it is
fixed by Riccardo in the new tags of CompositionTools (rf-121701).

 I repeated the study with the new tags (IslBrecoilUser/tags-122101). We
have to add some new tags to make things working fine in analysis-12a. You
have to take the tags in

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/CP/beta/doc/postCP/tags-anal12

 I ran on two colletions (one of superblock1 and one of superblock2).
Again the results are very compatible. Just problems in some modes with
low yields:

 - mode 53 seems to be gone
 - some disagreement in mode with high multiplicity and with many kaons
   (19-20-35-45)

 No other evident bugs were found. More studies should be needed but since
these modes are not crucial we can post-pone them.


 Then the CONCLUSIONS are:

 - good agreement but I need to run on the full sample of reduced
   collections to say more.
 - no lack of yield in the main modes
 - Dpi mode is fine.
 - We have to move to the new tags with bug fixes for the new production

 - I don't understand numbers presented by Urs in

 http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islreco
il/modes/mesallevents-0-1.eps

 All D*pi have a lack of ~25% in yields. In my study I did not see any
problem in this mode.
 I tried to look at the production root files for the D* and I noticed
something strange. For instance in:

/nfs/farm/babar/AWG/ISL/recoil/root/breco-112101/data/
dstar_092701_superblock1_2000_b2-s3_aa.root

I see ~630 events (originally the collection had 2000 events) and the run
range is 15300-15600. Runnning on the same collection I got ~1750 events
with a run range of 15300-16400. Something is wrong here and could explain
the difference in yield that we are observing. Urs, may you run on this
collection and check. Thanks,

 Daniele




On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Urs Langenegger wrote:

>
> Hoi,
>
> ok, I  redid the mode-dependent study,  you can find  them starting at
>   http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/modes/modes.html
>
> The signal  pdf is a gaussian  for the mode-dependent  mes plots.  All
> modes I see are shown. No cut  on purity has been applied. All data in
> Run 1 in superblock 1 and 2 are used.
>
> I  now see 41376  B candidates,  fitted with  CB, this  is due  to the
> patched B+ modes, see
>
>   http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/modes/mesallevents-0-1.eps
>
> You can run the relevant macro by doing
>
>   cd ~ursl/root/anaRecoil
>   root
>   .L .../recoil.C    // wherever you have your IBU stuff
>   loadMergedFiles()
>   plotMes(2)  // the argument is the offset for the file
>
> Note:  Please edit recoil.C  first, so  that you  dump the  plots into
> another location (search for 'name' in plotMes() ...).  Of course, you
> can run it on your own rootfiles as well, just edit loadMergedFiles().
>
>
> Merry Christmas, now for good!
> --U.
>




Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use