Hoi Daniele

In Alessio's posting, the breakdown into superblocks is missing. I
find the following:

Updated
IBU
chains
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         > original TS Ibu TS dupli Ibu TS
         >
         >Dstar :
 33376 > sub1 47755 32921 1618
271710 > sub2 335800 223109 11992
150254 > sub3 234785 181374 18342
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
455340 618340

         >Dc :
  21002 > sub1 27987 41053 1357
 368848 > sub2 399950 480601 19297
1198129 > sub3 1359859 1011040 16872
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1587979 1787796

         >Dstar0:
  12814 > sub1 19936 28914 9
 243090 > sub2 274420 308806 192
1171574 > sub3 1298478 1046507 420
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1427478 1592834

         >D0 :
  38636 > sub1 53553 9754
 563393 > sub2 625498 32365
1314534 > sub3 1472164 1412533
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1916563 2151215


My (summed) yields are consistent with Alessio's different summed
yields (they'd better be, we use the same chains).

In summary, we usually have 88-90% of the 'original TS' yields for the
sum of all modes, except in the case of dstar (73%). sub1 has much
lower yields in all seeds on IBU level.

We should discuss the implications of this situation for production.

Cheers,
--U.