LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  April 2002

VUB-RECOIL April 2002

Subject:

Production of 04/13/02

From:

Urs Langenegger <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

26 Apr 2002 20:52:23 -0700 (PDT)Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:52:23 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (44 lines)


Hoi,

the production started  at 04/13/02 is coming to its  end -- thanks to
Alessio, the broncos and kanga. 

The production took about 20'000 hours of (SLAC) CPU, the elapsed wall
clock  time is two  weeks. This  included all  data, cocktail  MC, and
generic BB  MC.  No  udsc MC  was processed.  If  we can  avoid making
reduced collections ourselves  (and I do hope so  -- either with skims
or by brute force), we should be  in a manageable regime for 100 fb in
summer.

This  iteration should  have the  following features  compared  to the
previous one:
 - more SP4 statistics: 50% of the SP3 B0 cocktail, 150% of the SP3 B+
   cocktail and 60% more statistics in generic MC. 
 - fixed SP4 orphan bug
 - GHit base MC associator
 - More tracking information to study track selection
 - consistent (i)purity tables for all (charged) seeds
 - ISL conversions instead of default ones
 - ISL dalitz pairs
 - JPsi block
 - MC for run1 was processed with different PidTables than MC for run2
   (which is what should happen, but did not in the last
   iteration).  No track smearing was done on Beta level, needs to be
   done in recoilNtp and derivates. 

Note that  I had to separate  root and hbook files  (disks are filling
up), the different paths are indicated on the webpage.

I have updated the webpage with the relevant numbers in the table. The
chain files  provided on the webpage  are updated, but  not yet final:
Since  a few  cleanup  jobs are  still  running, there  will be  minor
changes to them (especially Dc generics) over the next few days.  I'll
be testing the chains, but if you find problems, please let me know.

Cheers,
--U.



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use