LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  June 2002

VUB-RECOIL June 2002

Subject:

study on the Mx cut (on data)

From:

Daniele del Re <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

15 Jun 2002 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)Sat, 15 Jun 2002 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (39 lines)

Hi all,

 in this plot

  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/mxsystplots.ps

 I show the fitted ratio of BR's as a function of the Mx cut on DATA.

 The blinding is applied, the fit to three shapes is on, the reweighting
for the B and D decays is not applied. The central value is going to
change since the correct trk and neutral smearing on MC (fix from Urs) has
to be applied and the files used to train the fit will be updated in order
to take into account the correct fraction B0/Bcha.
 For sure ,these numbers are fine to look at the stability of the fit.


GOOD NEWS: this plot looks encouraging. The BRBR variation is of the order
+-10%, a factor two less than the theoretical uncertainty due to the Mx
cut. From this plot we could extract systematics to take into account
possible violation of the duality in that Mx region. Remember that with
the three shapes fit we are not cutting on MX but all the events below
MxCUT are put together in a single bin and the full Mx region is used to
extract the ratio of BR's. Since we are not actually cutting, we could
start thinking about extracting the value of BRBR from this whole set of
fits.
For instance

central value = BRBR
spread = syst on BRBR due to duality violation.

LITTLE BAD NEWS: there is a jump (at 1.58GeV) around our present cut on
Mx. I will try to figure out if this is due to a fit instability.


 Daniele



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use