is the difference in quadrature correct? I mean, here we are addining just
background events. The increase in MC statistics is fake...
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Riccardo Faccini wrote:
> it is to be noted that the result on the generic agrees with the default
> value within the systematics from MC statistics that we would
> quote here...
> ciao
> ric
>
> On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > in order to quantify the impact of the crossfeed in the measurement, I
> > fit the data both with generic MC and generic+crossfeed MC as model.
> >
> > The results are:
> >
> > generic:
> >
> > BRBR = 0.0140658 +- 0.00365657(stat) +- 0.00198155(MC stat)
> >
> >
> > generic + crossfeed:
> >
> > BRBR = 0.0137173 +- 0.00345909(stat) +- 0.00192688(MC stat)
> >
> >
> > So the difference is the 0.0035 and the systematics we can quote is 2.5%.
> >
> > Daniele
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|