sure
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/
Q=0
All dataFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
B0 dataB0FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
Bch dataBchFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
Q=1
All datach101FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
B0 datach101B0FINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
Bch datach101BchFINALmxhadkpfitresults_nocat.eps
Daniele
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Oliver Buchmueller wrote:
>
>
> Hi Daniele,
>
> do you also have the plots for this Mx fits?
>
> Oliver
>
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I repeated the fit using Mx instead of the fitted Mx.
> >
> > These are the results:
> >
> >
> > Q=0
> >
> > All
> > BRBR = 0.0175419 +- 0.00407794(stat) +- 0.00118571(MC stat)
> > chi2=0.883673
> >
> > B0
> > BRBR = 0.00401112 +- 0.00680338(stat) +- 0.0019864(MC stat)
> > chi2=0.994055
> >
> > Bch
> > BRBR = 0.0264318 +- 0.00509347(stat) +- 0.00171483(MC stat)
> > chi2=1.66344
> >
> >
> >
> > Q=1
> >
> > All
> > BRBR = 0.0254868 +- 0.00452458(stat) +- 0.00137868(MC stat)
> > chi2=0.891207
> >
> > B0
> > BRBR = 0.0142957 +- 0.00719002(stat) +- 0.00221697(MC stat)
> > chi2=1.20538
> >
> > Bch
> > BRBR = 0.0332868 +- 0.00586739(stat) +- 0.00192195(MC stat)
> > chi2=0.607417
> >
> >
> > The results are perfectly in agreement with the ones obtained
> > with mxhadfit (compare with the table in the BAD). The errors are of the
> > same order. You can comment the chi square by yourself.
> >
> >
> > Daniele
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|