LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  July 2002

VUB-RECOIL July 2002

Subject:

Killing duplicates

From:

Alessio Sarti <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

06 Jul 2002 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)Sat, 06 Jul 2002 22:51:29 -0700 (PDT)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (63 lines)

Hi,
those are the first results about the killing procedure applied without
any 'intelligent' algorithm in order to preserve high purity modes.
All the candidates that are reconstructed in more than one seed or
superblock are 'killed'.

This not seems the right way to do it. In fact what i see running on
superblocks 1 for various seeds is:

In input I have
D0 sb1:    Found 4335 entries in tree events
Dc sb1:    Found 2064 entries in tree events
Dst0 sb1:  Found 1667 entries in tree events
Dst sb1:   Found 4501 entries in tree events

And this is the number of duplicates candidadates killed
D0 sb1   :262 Num. of duplicates
Dc sb1   :349 Num. of duplicates
Dst0 sb1 :775 Num. of duplicates
Dst sb1  :2186 Num. of duplicates

This means that we are throwing away 50% of D* and D*0 candidates.
Of course this would not happen if the requirement on the purity is
applied. Given this first result I don't know if it will have any sense to
quote a systematic doing the fit having killed all the duplicated
candidates.

In order to check if I'm doing something wrong I've checked by hand (and
if you want you can do the same test: files are in
/a/sulky14/AWG12/ISL/killtimestamp
data are
ts_files.100X (D0)  X=0(sb4) X=2(sb3) X=4(sb2) X=6(sb1)
ts_files.20X  (Dc)
ts_files.30X  (D*)
ts_files.40X  (D*0)
) that the number of duplicated candidates in sb1 with respect to all
other events dumped for different superblock and seeds is ~ 50% of the
whole sb1 sample for D*. (sb1 has 37002 ev and I found 19392
duplicates...2000 are still in the same sb and mode: let's say that 2000
events are duplicated in the same superblock (1) and seed (D*)).

I'm trying to find a simple and smart way to keep the purity information
in orer to do a more appropriate test.
I'm still producing the 'free_of_any_duplicate' sample in order to look at
fit results but i think that the results would not be very helpful.

Questions and comments are welcomed.
Ciao,
Alessio

______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Now in charge as RQM
 Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
 tel  +39-0532-781928  Ferrara
roma  +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972

"Vorrei tanto sapere chi e' che va in giro a costruire quadrati
sull'ipotenusa"



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use