Hi,
> > 1) data-MC comparison is bad for B0 in the depleted sample. In particular
> > look at the pstar spectrum, nneutral and MX.
>
> How do you determine the "recoil" B? At the moment (HEAD of CVS),
> recoilNtp still uses == 2 to check against overlap with the BRECO
> candidate; I guess that this is not the right thing to do. This will
> affect any recoil (and depleted/enhanced, since the decision is based
> on kaons in the recoil) quantity.
I fixed this problem (I am going to commit it) and I rerun everything
accepting only events in which the best B id the first one (that
removes events affected by the problem about overlap).
Now the results are pretty encouraging:
data generic B0
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/
islrecoil/comparisons2/datageneB03
data generic ChB
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/
islrecoil/comparisons2/datageneChB3
The problem in the B0's seems to be gone. Even the mm2 plot for ChB looks
better.
Daniele
|