Hoi Alessio,

 > 1) The tags are the ones listed before?

Yes. The recipes on the web  work (which were in the old tagfile), all
corrections were to  tcl/cc in IBU and symlinks in  workdir. IBU has a
new tag (wrt to last week).


 > 2) Can you please clarify the procedure in order to have the right
 > pidkilling (we have to create a 'pidtables' link to what) ??

When you run on 2000 MC, do 
  ln -s /nfs/farm/babar/AWG/PID/tables/2000-r10     pidtables

When you run on 2001 MC, do 
  ln -s /nfs/farm/babar/AWG/PID/tables/2001-r10      pidtables

When you run on 2002 MC, do 
  ln -s /nfs/farm/babar/AWG/PID/tables/2002-b1-r10     pidtables

When you  change the period, don't  forget to change the  link. It's a
mess. An alternative is  to have several workdirs (workdir-2000, ...).
There  is a  printout in  the logfile,  so we  can verify  post factum
whether the name of the logfile (i.e. the part containing the year) is
consistent with  the pidtables directory  used. "run" could  check for
this when running with '-c'.

 > I remind all of you that now we have tcl files for DATA tahat are SPLITTED
 > btw on and off peak.
 > 
 > The new directories are:
 > data/200*
 > and data_off/200*

Yeah, my  fault. I was running  over newdata since it  was still there
and I had run over it before ...

 > The other tcl will be moved to an 'old' directory as soon as urs henning
 > and daniele will give me the authorization (I do not want to screw up any
 > running script :) !!)

Please  go ahead  and remove/rename  everything  that is  not good  or
consistent (my $0.02). Do we now have a good naming scheme for all tcl
files, so that  they are not only contained  in different directories,
but also the name indicates whether it's cocktail, generic, ...? 

Once everything is clear, please indicate who shall run over what.

Cheers,
--U.