Hi all,
seems (but the job that verifies this assumption is still running) that
the problem was related to a given file that i found to be corrupted.
I've removed that file and I ran over the 'sampled' data chain wihtout any
problem.
You can find the chains that I've used in
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~asarti/recoil/chains/
(those chains are also linked in the production webpage).
Let me know any problem related to those files/chains.
Alessio
______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
tel +39-0532-781928 Ferrara
roma +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi Alessio,
>
> I presume that by now you also found that we have a memory leak:
>
> CPU time : 61308.65 sec.
> Max Memory : 873 MB
> Max Swap : 920 MB
>
>
> It seems to me that the messed up Ks indices occur only at the end of
> this particular job. is this true in all cases? If yes, then it's
> probably a memory problem.
>
> I guess we'll have to find the memory leak. It'll speed up the job
> significantly.
>
> BUT: I also think it would be very useful if you could prepare a set
> of chains containing not more than 10^6 -- 10^7 (???) events. It does
> not seem very useful to spend a day in the queue when we can merge
> histograms and trees in a much shorter time.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
|