Hi Eric,
as we already discussed in Rome, the whole set of analyses on the recoil
of fully reconstructed Bs (i.e. Vub,Vcb,moments, b-> s gamma, b-> tau
nu) would profit from option 2 (where I assume you plan to write out also
the composites?) or 2a (this sounds really nice, is it really feasible?)

	thanks
	ric

P.S. long time ago our effort was renamed from Garbage to SemiExclusive
...

On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Eric Charles wrote:

> *** Discussion title: Exclusive Hadronic B Decays to Open Charm AWG
> Email replies to [log in to unmask] must include:
>   In-Reply-To: <"/EHBDOC/440/2"@babar-hn.slac.stanford.edu>
>   Subject: ...change this to be about your reply.
>
> Hi All:
>
> Aleksey Mints & I are about to embark on a prodution run for the
> "Garbage collection" BReco Samples.
>
> We intend to write information for all B-candidates (charged and
> neutral) in the GSB for all the "GC" modes to our ntuples. However, the
> exact form of that information is still a bit up in the air.
>
> The possibilities are:
>
> 1) "Thin" ntuples, ie, the standard ntuple with all the vertexing,
> tagging, pid, emc and ifr columns removed. Basically, the output would
> be little more that kinematic information.
>
> 2) "Standard" Kanga files for all events with at least 1 B-candidate in
> the GSB.
>
> 2a) "User" Kanga files with only the Composite candidates. These files
> will refer back to the standard kanga files. In principle it will be
> possible to reproduce the composite candidates from these files.
>
> Basically, the point of this message is to ask if anybody else could
> benifit from this. If so we should discuss the final output format ASAP.
>
> -e
>