Hi all,
I've taken a quick look into the recoilDSys.cc code and I couldn't find
were we are imposing the constraint for the sum of semielptoni B decays to
add up to 10.4%....
I do not remember if I was in charge of that or if Ric implemented it but
maybe we can take a new look at the code and understand if it working
correctly..
Alessio
______________________________________________________
Alessio Sarti Universita' & I.N.F.N. Ferrara
tel +39-0532-974328 Ferrara
roma +39-06-49914338
SLAC +001-650-926-2972
"... e a un Dio 'fatti il culo' non credere mai..."
(F. De Andre')
"He was turning over in his mind an intresting new concept in
Thau-dimensional physics which unified time, space, magnetism, gravity
and, for some reason, broccoli". (T. Pratchett: "Pyramids")
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> plots for the B and D systematics on data are
>
> D BR's:
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Dsyst.eps
>
> B BR's:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/Bsyst.eps
>
> B+D BR's:
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/BDsyst.eps
>
> B+D systematics on data is 4.4%
>
>
> plots for scan cutting on integrated purity are
>
> cut on the minimum value (intpur>cut)
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpur.eps
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/minintpurminintpurdiff.eps
>
> cut on the maximum value (intpur<cut)
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpur.eps
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/maxintpurmaxintpurdiff.eps
>
>
> Daniele
>
>
|