Hi urs, opening one of the files you point at, for istance
/nfs/farm/babar/AWG12/ISL/sx-071802/newsig/rootfiles/vubmc-2002-new2002-1.root
I find the runnumber 1726414
which bfreport classifies as
1726414 2k B -> Xu l nu incl. only
which means B_Xulnu_VUB.dec, i.e. non resonant only
the mixed sample (i.e. hybrid) is
B->Xu l- nubar+CC
whose .dec is
B_Xulnu.dec
there are 3M events of this kind already produced.
I would say that they have not been run on yet
(I cannot even find the tcls, but I might be wrong)
ciao
ric
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi Daniele,
>
> > I discovered (unfortunately too late) that the "official" chains contain
> > only the non-resonant signal MC. Looking into the directories I did not
>
> which chains do you mean with "official"? The final in "csx-111202"
> ones or the signal ones in "sig"?
>
> The signal chains in chains/csx-111202 contain (as far as I can tell)
> the *hybrid* (is that what you mean with mixed?) signal MC, not the
> non-resonant MC:
>
> csx-vubmc-2000
> csx-vubmc-2001
> csx-vubmc-2002
>
> This is equivalent to what we have in the "signal" directory
> (discarding a handful of old MC affected by the KS bug).
>
> I have added the new resonant production to chains/csx-111202:
>
> csx-vubreso-2002
>
> I have searched for the nonresonant MC, but I do not find either
> chains or tcl files for it. I guess we have to wait for Alessio.
>
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
|