Hoi,
I have reproduced the data-reduction/"efficiency" table 8. It'll be in
the new BAD, or in
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/effTable.ps.gz
A few remarks:
o The mm2 cut is much less efficient on the signal than it used to
be (54.1% -> 42.3% for the single cut)
o The overall efficiency for signal is at 30.1% which is not quite
what we give in table 12 from the fit. I am not quite sure about
the difference, but think that this is probably due to the fact
that in this table the normalization sample does not have a p* cut
applied.
o The signal efficiency on the depleted sample is quite high.
For this table I had to run anaRecoil. I find that the default fit is
different from the default fit obtained with the output of anaQA, when
both are run without PidKilling (for Kaons):
k00 CF default, ursl-121002, no Kaon PK 0.018483 +- 0.00254913(stat) +- 0.00142799(MC stat)
k09 CF default again 0.018483 +- 0.00254913(stat) +- 0.00142799(MC stat)
k21 CF anaRecoil 0.019723 +- 0.00264981(stat) +- 0.00144295(MC stat)
I don't yet know why that is (or could be). There is no difference
between k00 and k09, both are with anaQA and they should be identical,
it's just a paranoia check that we have no random sequence hidden
somewhere.
Cheers,
--U.
|