Alessio,

could you tell me again how you get your numbers?

skimData gives me
 B+B- generic  (all SP4) 151518168
 B0B0bar generic (all SP4) 146336064


To these events you need to subtract:
34M B+B- with Kaon bugs
21M B+B- with beamspot bugs
The same numbers (34M+21M) for B0B0bar

So at the end you will get:
96M B+B- => 183 fb-1
91M B0B0bar => 173 fb-1

I think you can still use the ~40fb-1 with the beam spot bug, the software fix for that works OK.

Ciao, Concezio.


Alessio Sarti wrote:

> Ok,
> as usual I managed to make more and more confusion.
>
> > > >  skimmed  unskimmed  total SP4
> > > >       6 +  144 + 50    200 B0
>             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I didn't realized that the problem was here :( sorry.
>
> Right numbers (again) are:
>             6 +  114 + 50    170 B0
> > > >     7.6 +  110 + 42    160 B+
>
> > > >  Two questions:
>
> That question remain::
>
> > > >  1) is that what we expect (please concezio can you validate thos numbers?)
>
> That one is solved now :)) !!!!!
>
> > > >  2) Concezio (again) why there's that discrepancy btw B0 and B+ ?
> > > >
> > > >  From the talk linked in the coll meeting agenda
> > > >  http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Organization/CollabMtgs/2002/detDec2002/Mon2/bozzi.pdf
> > > >  i see that the number quoted (185 fb-1 overall) is in good agreement with
> > > >  what I see... (200+160)/2 .....
> > > >
>
> Ok now we have 165fb-1 aginst 185fb-1 I'll debug with concezio why those
> numbers are different......
>
> Hope that now the situation is clarified.
> Alessio
>
> > > >  I've already started the production of what is missing and I'll keep all
> > > >  of you up to date.
> > > >
> > > >  Let me know any questions comments.
> > > >  Alessio
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >