Hi Ric,
> - the total track energy seems to be the thing which is mostly correlated
> with our problematic events, at least on the control sample. This is
> probably a handle for further investigation but not a solution
few days ago I performed a test applying a cut on etrk. I remind you that
in the category nchg=1 and nneu>0 data and MC are very different on this
variable (all plots are performed without any cut on prmm2):
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/B0cate5/comparisonnorm5etrkallcuts.ps.gz
and the data-mc agreement in mxhadfit (on this cat) is
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/B0cate5/comparisonnorm5mxhadfitallcuts.ps.gz
(lumi normalization)
with an excess of 30-35 event in the region around 1.5-1.7 GeV
Looking at the events with etrk<300 MeV the mxhadfit comparison in this
category is
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/plotsetrkB0/comparisonnorm5mxhadfitallcuts.ps.gz
Just a fraction of the excess seems to be related to this excess
at zero in this variable.
Daniele
|