Hoi Ric,
thanks for the feedback. I have implemented all except
> 2. section 3.1: the definition of deltaE and Mes are incorrect
> (mes=sqrt(S/4-p*^2); deltaE=E*-sqrt(S)/2)
I guess this is inconsistent in our code. CompSemiExclSelectBCand.cc
uses the cms frame, but I think that we fill the ntuple with the
values from BtaBVariables.
If I am not mistaken we take mes from BtaBVariables and that uses the
lab version for mes (again, if I don't err).
> 5. end of section 3.3: did we switch the definition of eps_u and eps_mx?
> are the numbers there correct?
Not sure I see where this is. I did introduce the variables to be
consistent with the table.
> 6. section 4, third to last paragraph. I do not think it is useful to
> mention again the meaning and value eps_u. I would only quote eps_mc at
> this point, but I would not say that it depends only on theo input.
> In a presentation I would also like to show the result in terms of p*,Q^2
> and also neutral and charged multiplicity (I think we need to make these plots).
With p* you mean the fit-derived overlay? Or the data/MC comparison
for low mx? I am not sure about the first option.
Cheers,
--U.
|