Hi daniele,
few minor comments:
- please add 'DEPLETED' to the bottom table (formal, but relevant
detail...)
- electrons on depleted are only 1.5 sigma from the enriched
measurement(6.8+/-3.1% as opposed to 1.9%)
- I would say that the only error that looks astray is the
Bch-depleted, since in all other cases the average of the susbsamples
seems to have the right error (did not check central values)
- for the next iteration, is it possible to have signal
expectations on the vcb subtracted plot also for the multiplicity fit?
ciao
ric
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Daniele del Re wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here two tables with the new results and plots
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~daniele/vub/newres.html
>
> My comments:
>
> 1) fits on superblocks are closer now
> 2) ele went up, muon went down
> 3) I am just noticing that only run2 has the excess at 1.5 GeV...
> 4) multiplicity fit is now very close to the default result
> 5) all depleted fit are a bit higher (and electrons have a two sigmas
> effect)
> 6) depleted error have some strange behaviour
>
>
> Daniele
>
|