Thanks Urs,
forgot to mention: did you redo also the scans (in particular the Mx one)?
ciao
ric
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi,
>
> I ran with the new generic MC included and have updated the BADs: All
> numbers (except the multi fit numbers in 540 which I accidently
> deleted and which are being redone at the moment) and the plots in 582
> are updated. All changed a bit, have a look for yourself.
>
> In http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~ursl/talks/032803/main.ps.gz you can
> find the usual set of data/MC comparisons.
>
> The efficiency tables in 540 still need to be updated (I'll do that),
> and also the zillion of fit plots (I don't want to change the naming
> scheme now).
>
> The muon misid jobs are still running.
>
> Also: It would be very beneficial if some else could run all the fits
> so that we have two independent cross-checks.
>
> Another thing: I think it would be even more useful if someone could
> check the computation of the branching fraction b2ulnu with error
> propagation from BRBR. Same for Vub. I think it would defeat the
> purpose if this were done with my code.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>
|