oho ... this is amaizingly small ... anyhow we seem to see that the
sensitivity is below 1%. Do we want to quote these numbers in the BAD and
lower the systematics to 0.5%?
ciao
ric
______________________________________________________
Riccardo Faccini
Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma
tel +39/06/49914457 Fax.: +39/06/4957697
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini
Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica
"We need serenity to accept what we cannot change, courage to change what
we can and wisdom to distinguish between the two" [R. Kiplin, allegedly]
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi,
>
> I ran and set the emc energy of all truth-identified klong clusters to
> 0. The result is
>
> Batch Description BRBR
> ===================================================================
> o12 KL EMC clusters = 0 0.0203027 +- 0.00250567
> o01 with KL scaling 0.0201532 +- 0.00251257
> o00 default 0.0202685 +- 0.00250473
>
>
> At least it's in the other direction compared to increasing the
> deposited energy with Alessio's scaling.
>
> In case you check in the logfiles (at the usual places): The
> printout's claim of scaling with a number is wrong, because I only
> updated the code but not the printout...
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
|