Hi Urs,
>
> Hoi Ric,
>
> > I cannot follow your argument. The non-resonant MC plain wrong,
>
> If we think so than we should use ISGW2. Then we should not mix in
> something that is wrong. If we think that the non-resonant is wrong,
> then we will not combine with b2sg. All of the inclusive b2u analyses
> relie on the non-resonant approach (one can argue about the model for
> the SF we put in, but this is not the point here).
>
I think the non-resonant is wrong because it is missing the resonant part
and this is why we are creating the hybrid. Do you agree that the
efficiencies estimated on the non-resonant MC would be wrong?
ciao
ric
|