Hi Urs,

I am really puzzled now, sorry.
The code below is the reweighting for the B branching fractions and I do
not really get the connection with ddecay.table, which has the exclusive D
branching fractions (but I have ddecay.table twice as well, once in
RecoilAnalysis and once in VirVubFitter, but they look identical to me).
So what do you mean by "I do have some other version in..." ? The
ddecay.table or the code you are seeing in my RecoilAnalysis or something?

Differences in the lines quoted below from recoilDsys.cc (I assume)
might arise from the changes I made to it. I put in the values and
errors from Ric's reweighting page (and committed it some time ago).

Cheers,
Kerstin


On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote:

>
> Hoi Kerstin,
>
> I do  have some other  version in ~ursl/macros/fsx/vub/RecoilAnalysis,
> but  I would  not  know if  the changes  are  good or  bad. E.g.   the
> B0->D*lnu is low at 4.60 (not even BABAR's measurement is that low):
>
>   float xv0[6]={10.5,2.11,4.60,0.,0.63,0.23}; // existing measurements (order: all semilep, D,D*,nothing,D1*,D2*)
>   float xt0[6]={10.4,2.10,5.60,9.,0.56,0.37};// values from decay.dec
>
> I know for one that it (allows  to) sets the seed in a predefined way,
> but I have not looked into the rest.
>
> I also just  realized that this code exists  now in RecoilAnalysis and
> VubAnalysis ...
>
> I'd  propose you  or Ric  (as author)  should put  out  the definitive
> version.
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
>