Hi Urs,
these are exactly the results I get.
So I assume you can go ahead and do your studies, while we keep trying to
figureout this small difference we all have with Virginia ...
ciao
ric
______________________________________________________
Riccardo Faccini
Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma
tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini
Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica
"I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree"
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Urs Langenegger wrote:
>
> Hoi,
>
> I am trying to reproduce the fits (PRL like for speed reasons) and I
> tried to follow
>
> http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/islrecoil/VirFitter_instr.html
>
> I run on
>
> fileVubTotal :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root
> fileVubTotalres :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root
> fileVubTotalnres :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubnre_small.root
> fileVcb :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-genb-new_small.root
> fileVcb1 :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root
> fileVcb2 :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-vubmix_small.root
> fileData :/nfs/farm/babar/AWG6/Recoil/newprod/root/anaQA-prl/reduced/csx-data_small.root
>
>
> I have the HEAD of VirVubFitter.
>
> I obtain
>
> BRBR Command
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 0.0196 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -opt 1 -rew 1 -wF sysWd/refWeights -flag binmes-rew-1-opt-1
> 0.0279 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -rew 1 -opt 1 -debug -flag prlresult
> 0.0193 subVirFit.pl -int -d -b -binmes -rew 1 -wF sysWd/refWeights -flag binmes-rew-1
>
> The first line is from the webpage, the second line is from
> "SubVirFit.pl -h". The third is w/o "-opt 1". I am not surprised the
> second does not work because I guess it misses the weight file. But I
> don't know why the first line is 5% away from the result.
>
> Is this to be expected? If not, could somebody in the know please post
> an exact line that I can copy-paste to reproduce the PRL as close as
> possible?
>
> Cheers,
> --U.
>
|