Hi Kertin,
the recipe is:
- take those variations and treat them as uncorrelated.
- we should also consider the variations correponding to the 1sigma
contours according to CLEO's largest variation, but we will discuss this
in more detail next week
ciao
ric
______________________________________________________
Riccardo Faccini
Universita' "La Sapienza" & I.N.F.N. Roma
tel +39/06/49914798 Fax.: +39/06/4957697
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~rfaccini
Univ. La Sapienza. 2,Ple Aldo Moro, I-00185 Roma Dipartimento di Fisica
"I don't understand what you say, but I believe I disagree"
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Kerstin Tackmann wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the plan for the evaluation of the theory error? We produced
> spectra with varied values of mb and a using Dominique's weight files.
> Should we treat the variations as correlated or uncorrelated? I remember
> that the studies Virginia and Concezio showed last week assumed no
> correlation between mb and a. Will this be the final way (at least for now
> and in the de Fazio-Neubert approach) to treat this uncertainty?
>
> Cheers,
> Kerstin
>
|