LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL Archives

VUB-RECOIL Archives


VUB-RECOIL@LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL Home

VUB-RECOIL  August 2004

VUB-RECOIL August 2004

Subject:

partial reco of B->D*lv, D*->D pi

From:

Edward John Hill <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

23 Aug 2004 14:34:13 -0700Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:34:13 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (49 lines)


Hi-

I've been waiting to present this material at a meeting but with the build up 
to ICHEP and ICHEP itself, we haven't been able to meet.  So, i may as well 
just send it around now...

We have implemented a partial reco with D* -> D pi0 and D*0 -> D0 pi0 while 
also making a small improvement to the previous PR of D* -> D0 pi+

I have a webpage with plots, etc here:

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/BFROOT/www/Physics/Analysis/AWG/InclusiveSL/vub-nosf/ejhill/partreco/comparison.html

The key points are the following:

For the pi+, in recoilNtp the selection simply looks for the lowest momentum 
charge correlated pion.  We added one further constraint: that the pion 
momentum also be below 200 MeV.  The result is that the efficiency, s^2/s+b 
are improved slightly and the distribution of the efficiency vs missing mass 
cut is flatter for the b2u events.  Also, improvement is visible in the B->pi 
lv mode of the mX distribution.  

For the selection of D*(0) -> D(0) pi0 we dont have the use of the charge 
correlation between the pion and leading lepton.  Instead we used the opening 
angle between the 4-vector leading lepton and the pi0.
The pi0 with the lowest momentum is taken that passes these cuts:
1. momentum below 200 MeV
2. opening angle with the leading lepton > 2.2 rad 
3. neutral multiplicity > 4 

I realize that a cut on neutral multiplicity for the selection of the pi0s 
might raise an eyebrow, so i included before cut / after cut distributions of 
the neutral multiplicity on the wepage also to demonstrate we are not 
rejecting much high-multiplicity b->u.  If you don't use the neutral 
multiplicity, the b2u events peak at mm^2=0, and thus the method is useless.

Please have a look at the webpage for the results.

Cheers,
Ed







Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2010
December 2009
August 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager

Privacy Notice, Security Notice and Terms of Use