Hi Andy
I agree with Chris here. If would be great if the xfrcmd directive
behaved the same as the -x option.
cheers
Manny
Brew, CAJ (Chris) wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>I haven't spoken to Manny yet but on point two I would suggest that since
>the documentation states that the '-x' option overides the 'xfrcmd'
>directive in the config file then the format of the argument should be
>treated exactly the same. Is there any reason why this should not be the
>case?
>
>Any idea how long it take to get these changes in?
>
>Yours,
>Chris.
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [log in to unmask]
>>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>>Andrew Hanushevsky
>>Sent: 17 September 2004 00:13
>>To: Emmanuel Olaiya; [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: OSS/MPS staging bugs?
>>
>>
>>Hi Manny,
>>
>>
>>
>>>1) According to the manual the oss.stagecmd gets give two arguments
>>>sourcefn and targetfn, as far as we can tell these are
>>>
>>>
>>passed backwards.
>>
>>
>>>i.e. targetfn sourcefn.
>>>
>>>
>>Quite correct! We never noticed this because the local root
>>and remote root
>>are always the same. So, here (and IN2P3) files on disk have
>>the same name
>>as files in the MSS. I will fix this.
>>
>>
>>
>>>>2) Within mps_Stage the xfrcmd directive is not treated
>>>>
>>>>
>>the same as the
>>
>>
>>>-x option. If we run:
>>>
>>>
>>Quite correct also. How would you like this one to work? This
>>is actually
>>the first time anyone actually tried to specify the command
>>in the config
>>file.
>>
>>Andy
>>
>>
>>
|