Hi Heiko et al.,
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> * discussion on the Publication strategy
> My proposal: Aim for Moriond QCD/CKM2005 with a preliminary result
>
> Problem: Need to go into collaboration wide review until ...
> (Moriond QCD is March 12-19)
Yes, this is tight.
> Question: Can we show something at CKM2005 which has only the
> AWG approval, i.e. something which has been in principle
> already improved for ICHEP2004 but is presented then with
> the full Run1-Run4 statistics?
I think anything we show at CKM2005 will need pubboard approval (Ric can
tell me if management disagrees). That does not mean that it needs to
have a CONF note, but there must be enough documentation for AWG, RC and
BaBar signoff on the physics.
Bob
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////
/ Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \
\ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria /
/ Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \
\ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 /
/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
|