Hi Bob,
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Hi Heiko et al.,
>
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Heiko Lacker wrote:
>
> > * discussion on the Publication strategy
> > My proposal: Aim for Moriond QCD/CKM2005 with a preliminary result
> >
> > Problem: Need to go into collaboration wide review until ...
> > (Moriond QCD is March 12-19)
>
> Yes, this is tight.
>
> > Question: Can we show something at CKM2005 which has only the
> > AWG approval, i.e. something which has been in principle
> > already improved for ICHEP2004 but is presented then with
> > the full Run1-Run4 statistics?
>
> I think anything we show at CKM2005 will need pubboard approval (Ric can
> tell me if management disagrees). That does not mean that it needs to
> have a CONF note, but there must be enough documentation for AWG, RC and
> BaBar signoff on the physics.
Yeap. Then we need to hurry up.
Cheers,
Heiko
> Bob
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////////////////
> / Robert V. Kowalewski \/ Dept. of Physics and Astronomy \
> \ particle.phys.uvic.ca/~kowalews /\ University of Victoria /
> / Tel: (250)721-7705 \/ P.O. Box 3055 \
> \ Email: [log in to unmask] /\ Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 /
> /////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
>
>
|