Short corrcetion: Concezio just sent me an email saying
that he cannot on Thursday next week. So Let's meet on
Friday, 20th of January, next week.
Concezio & Roberto: please keep us informed already before
where you are standing and what kind of problems you are
encountering.
Cheers,
Heiko
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a follow-up Concezio, Francesca and myself had a discussion.
> Concezio will give a short status report on Monday in the AWG meeting.
>
> Here is the tentative time schedule/working agenda:
>
> 0. Content of the publication: We want to have results for
> * mX-q^2
> * mX
> * P+
> * difference in charged and neutral B's
>
> Concerning quoting the result we intend to show them for
> * SF parameters obtained from b->s gamma + b->clnu moments
> * SF parameters obtained from b->s gamma spectrum
> * mX-q^2: results quoted for different regions that can be
> used by B->Xsll
>
> * For HFAG purposes (not in paper): separate numbers for
> b->s gamma + b->clnu moments
>
>
> 1. Improve our mES fit procedure!
> This might solve various open problems we have seen:
> - problems in 1-bin unfolding
> - instabilities in mm^2 scans
> - unphysically large differences in B+ and B0 partial BF's
> This is the bottle-neck of the analysis.
>
> Concezio and Roberto will keep in close contact and try to
> settle this as fast as possible.
>
> We are proposing to meet next Thursday instead of Tuesday since Concezio
> is travelling next Tuesday. The same we want to do in the next-to-next
> week. If 8:45 for next two Thursday's imposes a problem please speak up!
> Otherwise I will shift the phone conference reservations for the next
> two weeks to Thursday.
>
> 2. Once the m_ES fit procedure is settled which is hopefully the case on
> the time scale of 1-2 weeks we need to decide on the neutral & track
> selection. For this we need to redo the mm^2 scans. Roberto, what is
> your time estimate for doing this?
>
> 3. Systematics
> a) During 1. & 2. Wolfgang can improve on the PID systematics procedure.
> b) Kerstin: Is it possible to use the code as it is we are using for
> re-weighting the multiplicity categories to apply it on the analysis?
> If so, we could reduce the hadronization uncertainty without too much
> code development. Otherwise we should stick to the more conservative
> treatment.
> c) Klong: Wolfgang, do you have any news from David?
> If there is nothing avaiable very soon we have to stick to
> the old recipe.
> d) Running the systematics is expected to take about 1 week.
> I assume this is shared at least by Roberto and Wolfgang.
> What about the availability of Antonio?
>
> 4. Documentation:
> 1) BAD: volunteer?
> 2) PRL draft: Heiko volunteering
>
>
> If there are additional inputs for Concezio please let him know in time.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Heiko
>
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Heiko Lacker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is the list of things to-be-done (modulo stuff I forgot,
> > so please correct me):
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Task: Person Status
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > * mES fits Roberto
> >
> > * improve systematics procedure:
> > - PID Wolfgang
> > - Klong Wolfgang
> > - Hadronization: It would be nice to
> > reduce the 3% quoted if time allows.
> > Currently, we are conservative.
> >
> > * Repeat systematics after final
> > track & neutral selection fixed:
> > - Tracking eff. ?
> > - Neutral Eff. ?
> > - Neutral Corr. ?
> > - K_L ?
> > - PID eff. and misID ?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > - mES shape ?
> > - mES parameters ?
> > - eps-double-ratio ?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > - SF parameters ?
> > - SF form ?
> > - Excl. b->ulnu ?
> > - Hadronization ?
> > - Gluon splitting ?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > - B SL BF's ?
> > - D BF's ?
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > * writing supporting document ?
> >
> > * writing PRL draft Heiko
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Heiko
> >
>
|